In an earlier article, I wrote, The Prep Act: Protecting Pogroms Perpetrated by Prescription. This Act had been signed by President George H. W. Bush provided immunity to Big Pharma for the harm caused by a medical response in an emergency. This Act was enacted in December of 2005 as a result of envelopes supposedly filled with anthrax received by Congress in 2001. Frightened politicians, not wishing to have to deal with delays in any needful treatment knew that the Medical “community” would balk at making any quick decisions (and treatments) in fear of financial damage. So, the Prep Act removed that concern by removing their liability – assuring that, if necessary, Congress would receive immediate treatment by that “community” if required.
Of course, this made the Act available when the “pandemic” of 2016 “happened” followed closely by the mandating of “vaccinations” to “cure” or “prevent” the “unknown disease” COVID – yada-yada-yada &etc. Seldom have legal efforts been made to prevent justice being served on criminals, but the Prep Act has certainly been a great help to those inventing and disbursing these “vaccines” who would, under ordinary circumstances, be in danger of having to answer to those who have suffered (and died) as a result of their nostrums. How to fix that? Why remove the liability, of course! And so, with the sudden (and so carefully planned) COVID “pandemic” in 2020, the Prep Act provided a perfect cover for any response put forth by the “medical industry” as these people and corporations no longer had to be concerned with the fall-out arising from their nostrums.
And as that fall-out is still playing out, apparently the Prep Act will, as intended, prevent Big Pharma from being held at least financially accountable for its part in the whole thing – perhaps even including the bio-agent responsible for the “pandemic” in the first place! It is an ideal set up! So ideal, that there are those who wonder if the 2001 “anthrax attack” was not another Deep State false flag designed to do just what it did do, give carte blanche to Big Pharma and those who profited from the “pandemic” to act without concern for financial consequences.
But now, at least, it may be that this immense injustice is being thwarted. According to Dr. Joseph Sansone’s blog, three States’ Supreme Courts – North Carolina, Vermont and Maine – have heard cases and ruled on the Prep Act. According to Dr. Sansone, it was a matter of parental consent. Parents had sued over their children being forcibly vaccinated but had lost in the lower courts, bringing the matter to those States’ Supreme Courts. In response to this situation, Dr. Sansone asked the question, “Why would you inject someone with a vaccine against their will?” To which he gave the answer(s):
· Because you are so sure the vaccine contains a wonderful, health-giving potion;
· Because it does not cross your mind you are committing a crime. Even if there was nothing in the syringe that you were injecting, STILL sticking a needle in someone is battery. Injecting them with a gene therapy could change their life’s trajectory and is even more of an attack on someone’s bodily autonomy;
· Because you think you are shielded from all liability by the PREP Act, but only after injecting the vaccine;
· Because you are being paid per injected dose;
· Because they are a child and therefore, you can!
· Because you are “just following orders.”
The Doctor then goes on to point out:
I do not know what was in the minds of the individual “health care” workers in Vermont, Maine and North Carolina who chose to inject children with COVID vaccines against their will, without a parental consent form, and without making much effort to learn what the parents’ wishes were. It makes you wonder what else happens in schools, away from the prying eyes of parents.
How often did this happen? We don’t know, but parents in Vermont, Maine and North Carolina were understandably upset enough to sue the health care workers and the schools over their children’s unwarranted jabs.
Instead of obtaining an easy win, in each case the parents and children lost in the lower courts. How could this be? Battery is battery. Consent is consent.
You see, the PREP Act provides an extraordinary, total liability shield over everyone involved in the administration of a “covered countermeasure.” Or at least people thought it did, until North Carolina’s Supreme Court ruling on Thursday.
The anthrax letters gave members of Congress PTSD. Even they could be attacked! And so they passed the PREP Act, allowing designated countermeasures to be used in an emergency, only after a cabinet Secretary had declared the emergency, then the HHS Secretary declared there was a drug or vaccine which had better than even odds of ameliorating the emergency, and then after the FDA Commissioner issued an EUA for the product.
Congress may have thought that was good enough — a 3-step process before the liability shield was issued. But we now know that it is not much of a deterrent. We also know that all you need is the potential for an emergency, not an actual emergency. And so, the PREP Act was born in 2005. And kids have been jabbed with a dangerous so-called vaccine.
Finally, a state Supreme Court said that no, the PREP Act does NOT protect vaccinators from being charged with other crimes, like battery. The PREP Act does not waive other Constitutional protections.
Many of us think the PREP Act is unconstitutional for that reason, but the courts have not agreed, until now.
What I still find troubling, however, is that the judges vote along party lines. We thought judges were “blind”—that they put aside all bias. Yet in case after case, the judge’s party seems to be the deciding factor as to how they will decide a case.
In any event, this blow to the PREP Act is welcome and long overdue.
Apparently, the North Carolina Supreme Court (at least) “opened a path for parents to sue schools and health clinics over the Covid vaccines. The ruling was 5-2 along party lines, with Republicans voting in favor of the parents and Democrats dissenting. Chief Justice Paul Newby acknowledged the PREP Act's broad immunity rules. But he added that the unwilling vaccination violated the constitutional rights of Smith and his parents — and therefore should void the immunity rules and open the way for lawsuits that claim violations of constitutional rights. Fellow Republican justices Richard Dietz and Trey Allen joined in Newby's opinion. Republican justices Tamara Barringer and Phil Berger Jr. wrote a concurring opinion that said they agreed with everything Newby wrote, but that they had wanted to go even further in rolling back health workers' immunity protections as provided by the Act.
Democrats, on the other hand, accused the Republicans of practicing the “judicial activism” they usually claim to oppose, stating that the majority of “turn(ed) somersaults to reach particular interpretations of the written law.” Interestingly enough, nobody seemed to look at – much less address – the incredible amount of “immunity” being granted by the Act to Big Pharma and those mandating (and carrying out) the application of what in this case are essentially bioweapons on an unsuspecting and trusting populace. Of course, this is the real crime of the Prep Act and thus demands penalties far greater than mere economic recompense for the damage that has been done to those forced to take these poisons – damage that may well be permanent and even fatal. None of what happened in the “Covid Pandemic” was an accident or misjudgment or even carelessness! It was (and remains) an attack on mankind itself and should be treated as the greatest treason to date against the human race!
Filter By:
