... To profit from real human capital, investors are obliged to help each other slay the serpents, dragons, and basilisks ( dracos / quareen ) of egotism, cupidity, unbelief, and vice ... all on offer in the same red-light emporiums owned by the Lords of Misrule (see: v iii). Real human capital mints coins of virtue so that life’s equity is exchanged in and out of bedrolls — ideally with the same partner. This means that circumventing hell on earth is not a matter of luck or unearned grace, but rather of sweat equity in a profitable domestic pursuit from which dividends and capital growth circulate through familial and communal fishing ponds.
Thus, on their own, faith and ritual are insufficient bearers of life on earth, regardless of knees bent, temples built, candles burnt, scriptures read, tithes paid, ‘amens’ said, confessions made, sins sinned, taxes spent, or prayer rugs and rings kissed with pious wishful thinking (James 2.17).
Folks who play by their own rules are Humanists of long-standing impunity; those whom scripture calls serpent heads (Gen.3.15). Humanists attract prodigals who, for a time, run from accountability and sweat equity while seeking dominion and gains apart from moral frameworks within the guiding limits of logos. By definition, Prodigals repent and leave the wilderness of sin, then return to the Promised Land of wisdom’s wizened larder, where they stay until properly able to earn their own destiny in submission to the Divine Performative of logos.
Scripture calls those who lose access to the repose under discussion, reprobates; serpent heads like Lamech and Cain, or Amorites & Amalekites, etc. (Gen.4.18; 15.14-16), referring, not so much to any tribe or nation, but rather to a state of being that stands in opposition to logos or dao. This is Satan, the antinomian Seraph who withstands divine order. Citizens tend to coddle these dust-loving id-serpents (501.1 & 501.2) and become sociopathic themselves as they enjoy exile from logos morals when affordable. They dwell-in and thrive-on collateral evils that produce the bad fruits they think are good (Matt.716). Mindless of divine grace, save as a dreamlike childhood memory, they hiss and scoff, inevitably facing a staggering midlife crisis and friendless old age as wormwood infested slime bags crowned in isolation by Medusa’s vipers.
This unloved and unloving selfish sovereignty is why Hosea and Jeremiah told reprobate Israelites—Jews who are not Jews (Rev.2.9); likely, the archetypal Amorite—they would return to Egyptian alchemy for a makeover as their own god (Hos.9.3-7; Jer.44).(i) This is also why Ezekiel called Pharaoh a ‘stuck-in-the-mud beached whale.’ In any case, god hated Pharaoh (Jer.44) whom the modern world hails. Curiously, God especially loved Pharaoh’s wife (Q.66.11).
Pharaoh thought he’d elevated himself to the estate of Celestial Man—G-d even, perhaps as the son of Trojan Zeus, from which derives Hesus (He-of-Zeus). But it seems to this writer it was in Adam and Eve’s cosmopolis—when Eve was not yet subject to Adam—that they walked and talked with the Ancient of Days in the Garden; not that any of us knows what that means. It's pretty clear however that it was not Pharaoh, Thoth, Khem, or Hermes. But take note: even Nietzsche’s Übermensch hero anticipates mankind’s restoration to a Golden Age, per the New Testament’s esoteric wedding (502.4); not that we know what that means either.
The imagination of pharaoh’s ‘Perfect Man’ is actually that of Christos Homo Noeticus, or better said: of Michio Kaku’s human strings in sync with Einstein’s Mind-of-God, something Hesus apparently accomplished by G-d’s will and not his own. Left to his own devices, Jesus would no doubt have skedaddled to a life far from folks he called ‘the walking dead’— those ‘of little faith people’ who can be likened to citizens who let legal fictions represent them (Lk.9.60) in courts of so-called justice.
The New Physics of Noetic Science provides evidence for Kaku’s strings, but is avoided by the mainstream because its purview's empirical facts support intelligent design, which embarrasses the hell out of scientists who disregard divine origins until death confronts them with more pressing matters of subjective concern. Those who chose to serve the Prince of this World (ii) while enjoying O2, fail to honor respiration’s Benefactor. In terms of Chinese metaphysics, which is no longer practiced thanks to serpent-head subversives described in v iii, such people have no Sheng (iii) and deserve no Jing because they habitually deflect grace and cause destructive outcomes like millions of dead bison, cancer epidemics, extinct river dolphins, acid rain, beached whales, bleached and dying coral ecosystems, autism, birth anomalies (including LGBT disorders), and suicidal dysphoria — all of which manifest nemesis rather than blessedness. Indeed, hellish ends await those who seed queer things and beings that come to pass into harm’s way after shuttering revealed truth.
To the contrary, successful heterosexual dyads, even if theologically illiterate, enjoy bosons that grant superior outcomes sustained by an inherent repose that is autonomously granted from above to within (below; John.3.3). No intermediary or sacred bloodletting required, thank you very much. As trans-dimensional cosmopolites, well-married folks produce and plant seeds of the Divine Performative’s True Vine, which is a New Testament (NT) play on the allegorical Tree of Life from Genesis. It is they who prepare their wedding garments as they clothe and veil the Bride.
The challenge is to avoid wily humanist serpent-heads and dust eaters who serve The Circus Immoral (v iii) because they are at enmity with the meaningful purpose of good seed (Gen.3.15). Allow me to explain in the following essays.
NOTES
i. Behold, I am against thee, Pharaoh, King of Egypt, the great whale that lieth in the midst of his rivers, that hath said, my river is mine own and I have made myself. ~ Ezek.29.3
ii. Prince of This World (aka CEO of SonsofDisobedienceChidrenofWrath.com) ... And you did he make alive, when ye were dead through your trespasses and sins, wherein ye once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the powers of the air, of the spirit that now worketh in the sons of disobedience; among whom we also all once lived in the lusts of our flesh, doing the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest. ~ Eph 2:2-4; John 2:14, 12:31, 16:11
iii. Sheng ~ From a course I prepared for UNITAR University in 2015): ...
The ancient Chinese did not develop a full-scale mythology or organized primitive religion, but accepted the natural world without excessive mythological personification. Both heaven and earth were regarded as implicit principles of potential vitality and life-giving powers. What was important is life was the totality of nature, with supreme divinity, Shang Di (life originator) & Tian (heaven) considered a continuum [tawhid or holism or gestalt (worldview)] Hence, an entity was not worthy of reverence if it/he/she did not benefit life and specifically, human life, as a whole. The term sheng suggests the power of extending or stretching life. Hence, the individual not giving face opposes the life-giving harmony of heaven and deserves disapprobation. A person with Sheng accepts responsibility for benefiting life
.
Any entity was considered unworthy of reverence if he/she/it did not benefit life and, specifically, human life as a whole. The term ‘sheng’ suggests the power of extending or stretching life. Hence, an individual not ‘giving face’ does not acknowledge human dignity and opposes the life-giving harmony of heaven. Such a person deserves disapprobation and receives no reverence (jing). ~ oz
Filter By:
