specially for muslims__discomfiture intended ... PART I
Essay #502.5-4 (revised Mar 2025) from
SEXOLOGY FOR THE WISE : essays on marriage, queers, and occult governance https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/7TS4H9SyH3 by Dr Omar Zaid
SEXOLOGY FOR THE WISE : essays on marriage, queers, and occult governance https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/7TS4H9SyH3 by Dr Omar Zaid
As best we know, Khadija brought food and drink to Mohammad during his retreats. Her life force—prana, TVC–EMF-stimulating bio-photons, Chi–emanating Yang aether, and bio-magnetic field (aura)—thus suffused him and his sustenance with clearly gendered complementary fractals that reciprocally completed the Yin-dependent, elemental ether of his being. Such an exchange cannot be compared with homologous, polygamous or licentious unions, or with the lopsided ascetic isolation of Lamas and Sufis. Khadija, even when not with him in body was his ever present, metaphysical, one-woman tea ceremony. His saturation by her personal management of all three realms of love (eros, fileo and agape) comprised a necessary part of the momentum that led to and help him fulfill his destiny. Without her singular, logos-filled living dynamo as his cardinal woman, there would have been an incomplete fulfillment of purpose. Together they became perfected, Vitruvian servants of truth. (1)
Principle:
Principle:
What becomes communal as the so-called muslim deen (i) depends on private workings that spill over from marriage beds into the street; ideally thse dynamic influences aid our journey on the dao of life.
What becomes communal as the so-called muslim deen (i) depends on private workings that spill over from marriage beds into the street; ideally thse dynamic influences aid our journey on the dao of life.
Most religious folks, especially those who support polygamy and/or repress women, completely misunderstand the parameters and purpose of marital dynamics in light of arcana.
Khadija was uniquely qualified for the sacred reciprocity Mohammad needed. No other woman could or would do as she was divinely appointed and prepared for the task, much like Miriam, the mother of Jesus. As a sign of this blest unicity and purpose, she provided his only surviving offspring. Mohammad was also monogamous while she lived. If the traditions are correct, Aisha even envied her memory. But why?
She had already fulfilled the monogamous yin-tasking that help complete Mohammad’s being. Her inherent and sui generis feminine essence advanced him to the fullness of masculinity with matured and practiced authority—long before he experienced any other nuptials. ... Indeed, for twenty-five years. ... He didn’t need Aisha or any other woman for this purpose. it was done, as Napoleon said when seeing Goethe: "Thar Be A Man"
She had already fulfilled the monogamous yin-tasking that help complete Mohammad’s being. Her inherent and sui generis feminine essence advanced him to the fullness of masculinity with matured and practiced authority—long before he experienced any other nuptials. ... Indeed, for twenty-five years. ... He didn’t need Aisha or any other woman for this purpose. it was done, as Napoleon said when seeing Goethe: "Thar Be A Man"
For this singular purpose, all other women were superfluous; another reason some interpret the Quran as saying they could easily have bee replaced, a view that purview appears to be bogus (i).
As discussed in previous essays, and in keeping with St Luke's ‘kingdom within’ (Lk.17.21), reciprocal marital deeds and vibratory succusions directly involve and affect quanta that direct endogenous physiological processes that culminate in the complementarity of simultaneous orgasms (2) that lawfully open spiritual portals in the midbrain. It is a joint venture that requires ongoing constellations of correct moral intent accompanied by clear communications and pristine gender complementarity. All are required for the transcendent synchronicity that aligns human and divine wills as a matter of daily, moment-to-moment praxis. Well-matched marriages therefore enjoin habituation to behaviors that invite and retain what many call divine guidance’ Sadly, most believers have been traditionally removed from this path due to chauvinist traditions, especially the tyranny of Arab neo-patriarchy (3).
No amount of despotic legalism can achieve the dynamic spiritual growth of divine guidance, which matrimonial grail can be accessed and protected but not forced. Despots throttle creativity and destroy the tripartite cord of eros, agape and fileo. In a balanced Viitruvian marriage, all three realms must be lawfully attended to and satiated.
No amount of despotic legalism can achieve the dynamic spiritual growth of divine guidance, which matrimonial grail can be accessed and protected but not forced. Despots throttle creativity and destroy the tripartite cord of eros, agape and fileo. In a balanced Viitruvian marriage, all three realms must be lawfully attended to and satiated.
Moreover. to counter fanciful theories, canonical sources bear no witness of prophets having used psychoactive substances like Captogon or shrooms to stimulate the midbrain and enter unseen worlds. Although, in all truth, it can be done. But such are illegitimate incursions and poor substitutes for the soma of unadulterated love. All prophets, including the son of Miriam, were married domesticates who launched their careers via dreams and visions while attending mundane marital affairs. All were summoned and ushered by wives and angels who clearly identified themselves as divine agents in both realms, repectively. The man who doesn't acknowledge and submit is a misguided fool because it is their passwords, given in concert, that grant passage through legitimate gates to sub-atomic dimensions of the unseen. The esoteric consummation of marriage provides the initial password, (metaphysically the 'yes' of "I do"), which is why Al’Ghazali instructed his disciples to marry before he accepted them.
Except for the late John Allegro’s generous extrapolations regarding the cultic use of shrooms (amanita muscaria) by the Essenes, I find no mention of exogenous psychoactive agents being ritually used by essential monotheist authorities. I can personally attest that such effects are impressively erratic, confusing, over-whelming at times, and largely misdirecting. Although one does encounter spirits who speak degrees of truth, the experience is no sign of legitimate guidance. Spirits in lower realms of existence are easily mistaken for divinely approved agents by fools, especially when spiritualists are predisposed to follow gurus of proscribed delusions stemming from the grand alchemy that allows them to escape earthly duties to wives and children.
To the contrary, dreams and visions have played out fruitfully for people like myself over the years, and most such outcomes are experienced when completely sober and suitably humbled. Of course, this experiential knowledge follows whirlwinds of contrition from the sundry subscriptions to error and sin that are common to all men.
Experiential knowledge-of and submission-to the metaphysical context that governs good marriages (Dr Butler’s Divine Performative)—either objectively and/or subjectively; the latter being ideal—is required for legitimate access to graceful living and portals of unseen benefit (grace). I therefore propose that habitual heterosexual consummation in intimate peaceful co-habitation completes essential human being in paired unicity by way of complementary plasma dynamics and amalgams described by Noetic Science in earlier essays (Q 78:8). This is the unicity that peacefully integrate seen and unseen to become one flesh (ongoing recapitulation of creation).
Non-heterosexuals and those unqualified for marriage simply cannot do it. Any howling at the moon for the sake of parity is near-infantile foolishness because this is the only union that fulfills and matures human purposes; all of which are existentially and experientially joined to pristinely gendered identities. This proposition also accords with spiritual law as expounded in Gen.2.24; Matt.19.5-6; Mk.10.8; Q.24.26, 30.21.
To Be Continued ... PART II: Imago Dei & The Tree of Lives
References :
References :
1. See: Contrition; Chapter 13: The Truest Religion https://forum.alginkgo.com/go/DQvNPAJZ4v
2. Sukel K (2011). Sex on the brain: Orgasms unlock altered consciousness. New Scientist (May). NB: LGBT folks generally do not simultaneously climax.
3. Sharabi, H (1988). Neopatriarchy: Distorted Change In Arab Society. Oxford U Press. ___ No doubt made worse after Freemasonic Infiltrations
Notes
Notes
i. Abul A`la Al-Mawdudi: The word ‘deen’ has several meanings. The first is sovereignty, power, lordship, kingship, or rulership. The second is submission, obedience, service or slavery. The third is to bring to account, to judge, or to dispense reward and punishment for actions. All three uses are found in the Qur’an.
The author suggests that all three manifest in marriages submitted toThe Divine Performative
i. On Mohammad's Wives (?)
[Supposedly] __ The 66th chapter of Quran deals exclusively with the conduct of the wives of the Prophet. One of its verses has been quoted in connection with the incident of "honey." Its fourth and fifth verses read as follows:
If you two turn in repentance to Him (to Allah), your hearts are indeed so inclined; but if you back up each other against him, truly Allah is his protector, and Gabriel, and (every) righteous one among those who believe — and furthermore, the angels will back (him) up.
If you two turn in repentance to Him (to Allah), your hearts are indeed so inclined; but if you back up each other against him, truly Allah is his protector, and Gabriel, and (every) righteous one among those who believe — and furthermore, the angels will back (him) up.
It may be, if he divorced you (all), that Allah will give him in exchange consorts better than you.
There is not a consensus of the commentators of Quran Majid and the historians upon the particular incident which is under reference in these two verses. Some say that the Prophet told something in confidence to Hadhrat Hafsa. She was, however, unable to keep the secret, and disclosed it to Hadhrat Ayesha. This breach of confidence drew the foregoing censure upon one of them for "betraying a confidence, and upon the other for encouraging the betrayal, thus abetting each other's wrong. [this interpretation is supposition].
Explaining the verses of the 66th chapter, Yusuf Ali, its translator and commentator, writes as follows:
The Prophet's household was not like other households. The Consorts of Purity were expected to hold a higher standard of behavior and reticence than ordinary women, as they had higher work to perform. But they were human beings after all, and were subject to the weaknesses of their sex, and they sometimes failed. The imprudence of Hadhrat Aisha once caused serious difficulties: the holy Prophet's mind was sore distressed, and he renounced the company of his wives for some time. ... Hadhrat Umar's daughter, Hafsa, was also sometimes apt to presume on her position, and when the two combined in secret counsel, and discussed matters and disclosed secrets to each other, they caused much sorrow to the holy Prophet, whose heart was tender and who treated all his family with exemplary patience and affection. https://www.al-islam.org/node/38452 [this also is nothing more than received speculation]
The truth is that the verse does not discuss wives at all, a term never mentioned.
The truth is that the verse does not discuss wives at all, a term never mentioned.
66:3 “And when the Messenger had taken into confidence one of his team of comrades in respect of a secret affair, and that team had exposed that secret, then Allah informed the Messenger of this act of theirs. So the Messenger reprimanded that team a little bit about some of it and ignored the rest. When he told them about their opening of that secret, that team counter-questioned the Messenger as to who told him about it! So the Messenger answered: “I was informed about it by the One Who is All Knowing and All Aware;
إِن تَتُوبَا إِلَى اللَّـهِ فَقَدْ صَغَتْ قُلُوبُكُمَا ۖ وَإِن تَظَاهَرَا عَلَيْهِ فَإِنَّ اللَّـهَ هُوَ مَوْلَاهُ وَجِبْرِيلُ وَصَالِحُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ۖ وَالْمَلَائِكَةُ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ ظَهِيرٌ ﴿٤﴾
66:4 And if you were to turn unto God in repentance, it will prove that your hearts are inclined towards goodness; but if your try to prevail upon him then be it known that Allah is his Master and Guardian, and similarly Quran and the righteous people of peace and faith and also some entities with special powers are also his helpers and supporters.
"اور کہا کہ اگر تم دونوں پارٹیاں اس خطا پر اللہ سے توبہ کر لیتے ہو تو اس سے ثابت ہوجائیگا کہ تمہارے دل بہتری کی جانب جھکاو رکھتے ہیں ۔ لیکن اگر تم نے اس ضمن میں نبی کی منشاء پر غالب آنے کی کوشش کی توجان لو کہ درحقیقت وہ اللہ کی ذات پاک ہے جو نبی کا آقا و مددگار ہے اور اسی طرح قرآن اور صالح مومنین بھی اور یہی نہیں بلکہ مخصوص مقتدر قوتیں بھی اس کی حمایتی اور مددگار ہیں۔"
عَسَىٰ رَبُّهُ إِن طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَن يُبْدِلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِّنكُنَّ مُسْلِمَاتٍ مُّؤْمِنَاتٍ قَانِتَاتٍ تَائِبَاتٍ عَابِدَاتٍ سَائِحَاتٍ ثَيِّبَاتٍ وَأَبْكَارًا ﴿٥﴾
66:5 If he sets your group/team free from his company or fires you, God might give him in your stead comrade groups better than you who submit to the Discipline (مُسْلِمَاتٍ), enforcers of faith and peace (مؤْمِنَاتٍ), have the spirit of obedience (قَانِتَاتٍ), repentant (تَائِبَاتٍ), good devotees (عَابِدَاتٍ), abstain from evil (سَائِحَاتٍ), hold good character (ثَيِّبَاتٍ), and those who take precedence in the performance of their duties (وَأَبْكَارًا).”
Allah swt is witness to the fact that another libel committed against His Holy Word has been effectively rebutted today through a purely academic research by this humble servant of His.
Anecdote: An Unhappy Muslimah Finally Dies
Koku Istambulova, a survivor of Stalin’s repressions, would have turned 130 in June, according to accepted pension records in Russia. She was older than a woman listed in the Russian Book of Records who died last month supposedly aged 128, officials believed.
Koku made headlines last year by saying she had never lived a single happy day in her long life.
A Muslim who was born before the last Tsar Nicholas II was crowned, she outlived the Soviet Union by a generation, according to her internal Russian passport. Her date of birth was claimed to be 1 June 1889 – when Queen Victoria was on the throne in Britain. https://is.gd/STtnwL
Filter By:
