Feminism and Lysenkoism, Assorted Notes
user profile
Predicting 2030
 November 22 2022
more_horiz

    One: ‘Girls seem more oriented towards their adult role as mothers . . . ’

    Thoday, 1967

    ‘their adult role as truck drivers,’ ‘their adult role as Presidents,’ ‘their adult role as mothers.’

     

    Two: if you do the arithmetic on the education of left-wing politicians, you’ll see that many were at university when the anti-human-nature theories were ascendant. The scientific data that disproved what they were taught at uni came out in following decades, but they were too busy chasing the greasy pig to catch up.

    So many of them, already of the belief that ‘environment is all,’ were suckers for postmodernism, which is arguably a sort of ‘ultra-environmentalism.’

     

    Three: how was the left able to so effectively implement anti-human-nature policies? Because it was able to ‘leverage off’ the right wing’s stubborn adherence to biological determinism – ‘woman = housewife.’

    Let there be no mistake, readers, the battle against the trans industry requires adherence to science: men and women do have some biological predispositions; but the genie is out of the bottle: girls can do (almost) anything.

     

    Four: Susan Pinker’s The Sexual Paradox is a great place to gain a sense of the reality that girls-can-do-anything-but-they-do-tend-to-do-some-things-more-than-other-things.

    political theory political history trans gender postmodernism
    Filter By: