Teacher scolds Muslim students for skipping 'pride' festivities, suggests they don't 'belong' in Canada - LifeSiteA Twitter post revealed the pro-LGBT rant directed at junior high students in an Edmonton Public Schools classroom.www.lifesitenews.comThese LGBT perverts are expecting ‘inclusiveness’, which means that those who believe that people should curtail their se
xual potentials and confine it to heterosexuality, wait for marriage before sex, and only have sex with their spouse, MUST embrace LGBT’s indiscriminate sexual proclivities that includes pedophilia, incest, sex with animals, and all other sorts of depravities, and disregard their own.
Tolerance swings both ways (pun not intended).
The immoral
cannot expect the moral to join in their celebrations of immorality as that requires the moral to give up morality. Can the moral similarly expect these immoral LGBT perverts to join in their celebrations of morality and give up their immorality? No. But the least the moral can expect is to have themselves and their children left out of the immorality of the immoral. If not, isn’t it like expecting everyone to be forcibly baptised into a religion for ‘inclusiveness’?
Can one say that if you expect to be respected despite not being the majority race, you must respect and celebrate the religion or sexual proclivities of a particular sector of society? How is that an equivalent? Respecting another race does not require me to become that race, but just tolerate their existence without depriving them of the means of sustenance. Should a Satanist expect Christians to ‘be inclusive’ and celebrate Satanism? No. The least that can be expected is for me to not be violent toward you, not practice what you preach. That is not what the LGBT abides by. They are nothing but child rapists whom want to get rid of child rape by getting the child to say yes.
These actions by the LGBT in schools is nothing short of child grooming, and should be treated with the same actions as one would a person trying to touch a child in a playground. It is not different from teachers saying, ‘I’m not going to have sex with your children till I groom them to ‘be inclusive’ and say ‘yes’ to coming to my bedroom.
And the police
'keeping the peace' in these proceedings is nothing short of ensuring that parents do nothing to stop the said person from teaching their son and daughter to say yes to sex with anyone, prior to touching their child. That makes the police, child sexual-grooming enablers. What next? The police going to stand guard outside the homes of pedophile teachers whom are fucking people's children whom they groomed through 'Pride' activities to be ‘inclusive’ and say yes? Are the police child sexual-grooming enablers now? If so, then the police cannot hide behind their uniforms whilst enabling the rape of children.
That's what it is, child rape, as children are being groomed to say yes so that they won't scream no. So are all the child rapists in history to be chided for not grooming the children first before having sex with them? Are people to avoid sex with children only if they aren’t successful in grooming children to say yes?
It's not surprising that the police have become one of the foremost of evils in western/ised societies, given that they blatantly protected governments whom imposed injections suspected to or known to maim or kill. This makes it nothing short of premeditated murder, and makes the police worse than all the guards who guarded extermination camps in previous wars, because the police are actually contracted by the people to serve and protect them, paid by the people, but instead, in effect, held the people down to be injected by ‘maintaining the peace’, or in other words, by stopping the people from stopping the murderers, and not stopping all the coercions that led them to roll up their sleeves for a 'medical' Russian Roulette. That makes the police the foremost terrorist organisation in force-vaxxing countries.
It is no wonder, that with this blatant murderous act on the people, that they can't see any problem with defending child sexual-grooming in schools in the US, Canada, the UK, and other highly 'literate' and 'educated' and 'advanced' and 'democratic' countries…..which proves that literacy, education, being ‘advanced’ and western-style democracy is nothing but a means for state sanctioned murder and rendering the population amenable to child rape.
The ‘British sense of fairplay’, for instance, is what i hear these silly Brits boasting about all these decades (despite their past and present history of savage colonial murderous policies, which they try to hide by their pretentious etiquette and politeness), whilst they now seem to have traded their 'fairplay' for 'childplay'. Same goes for all the other sexual child-grooming states.
But I’m not surprised that parents in these ‘literate’ countries are not responding like real parents in Muslim and Hindu countries – when I told a Tamil friend of mine about this, he was shocked, and he said, ‘if they try this in Tamil Nadu, the parents will take a sickle to the teachers!’). After all, they sat and did nothing as governments killed their population, babies in the womb, and children, with injections. So sex with children is nothing compared to murder right? We’ve always said that white people don’t know how to bring up their children. Seems like that is very much an understatement.
White man is the definition of sick, both those for and against, whom are all pandering to it by either sexually grooming children for sex with anyone and adults, or doing nothing effective to stop it immediately.
This whole nonsense of 'inclusiveness' must not include sexual grooming of children. If not, any parent can be accused of 'bigotry' for not letting their children have orgies in school with teachers because it is with adults.
‘Keeping the peace’ is the greatest act of violence if it is used to assault the Sanctity of Life and the Family.
Violence is the greatest act of peace if it is used in defence of, and to reinstate the respect for, the Sanctity of Life and the Family.
Anyone who wants to accuse another of illegitimate violence has to prove that the violence used does not reinstate the respect for the Sanctity of Life and the Family. All other arguments are superfluous and an effort to detract one from this basic principle, without the respect for which, there is no basis for the continuation of the nation-state, and the government can be seen as nothing but a colonial force out to kill people and rape children.
edX
Filter By:
