recent image
September 2024 Winning Contest Entries
thinkspot
 October 01 2024 at 07:31 pm
more_horiz
post image
We are pleased to announce the winners for the ‘Thoughts on Balancing Free Speech’ writing contest! The winners will be contacted by email to arrange the distribution of their prizes. Thank you everyone who submitted an entry! First Place Winner Thoughts on Balancing Free Speech: Return to the Trivium and Aristotelian Logic by KevinB. This essay presents a unique and intellectually engaging argument, drawing on ancient philosophy and contemporary legal issues to explore the balance of free speech rights. Very impressive! Second Place Winner Thoughts on Balancing Free Speech Rights: What the hell is even that? by HamishM This essay provides a rich and insightful analysis of free speech in the context of psychological, moral, and political dynamics. It balances a range of complex ideas while engaging the reader with intellectual rigor. Excellent work! Third Place Winner THOUGHTS ON BALANCING FREE SPEECH : As if there were such a thing as balance by Pwiker This essay offers a compelling argument for absolute free speech, supported by historical and contemporary examples. The exploration of indirect censorship tactics and power dynamics is thought-provoking, and the personal reflection on Kenya adds depth. Overall, it’s a well-argued and engaging piece. Great work! September 2024 Contest: Thoughts on Free Speech We have enjoyed hosting this writing competition and thought it was very successful. We received 23 thoughtful entries on our prompt and the process of judging them was very difficult. If you want to discover all of the entries, please click on the category "Contest September 2024" at the top of the Discover page. Not only were the submissions beautiful and well thought out, but our community of thinkers chimed in with their thoughts and ideas on many of the provocative entries. As a result, the submitting writers received valuable feedback and encouragement on their efforts. We hope you enjoyed the September writing competition as much as we did! We plan to host another writing competition very soon. If you have thoughts about a topic for a future contest prompt, please let us know in the comments. We'd love to hear your ideas.
recent image
thinkspot Newsletter October 3
thinkspot
 October 03 2024 at 02:37 pm
more_horiz
post image
September 2024 Winning Contest Entries By thinkspotThoughts on Balancing Free Speech: Return to the Trivium and Aristotelian Logic By KevinBThoughts on Balancing Free Speech Rights: What the hell is even that? By HamishMTHOUGHTS ON BALANCING FREE SPEECH : As if there were such a thing as balance By PWiker
recent image
THOUGHTS ON BALANCING FREE SPEECH RIGHTS:...
ddebow
 October 10 2024 at 09:23 am
more_horiz
In my view, speech should be anything but free. Bad speech, false speech, belligerent speech along with felicitous speech, informative speech, and inspiring speech should all carry a price, sometimes paying out and sometimes cashing in, with a full range of well-modulated possibilities in between. Viewing speech as some privileged human activity that we must cordon off and protect from reprisals is one factor contributing to its corruption. Speech is one of many ways a person transacts with other people. People learn to use their power of speech best when those transactions are allowed their natural consequences. Speech is consequential like J. L. Austin taught in his seminal, How to Do Things with Words. Doing crime with speech, things like theft, murder and injury should be punished with law. But everything else, including creating hate, should be regulated with societal norms, dirty looks, lost employment, and exclusion from certain fellowships. Like most things, the quality of speech generally improves when governmental involvement is minimized and people, through the pursuit of self-interest are allowed to discover that truth tellers and honest brokers are of greater value than charlatans and grand standers. The market has a way of rewarding those with well-conceived self-interests while extinguishing those without. But what is this market and what are its rules? The goal of every society is to effectively project itself into the future. Just like life wills its own survival and uses sexual reproduction as the means to project into the future, so does society will its own continuity and projects itself into the future through raising members that will maintain that society into the future. Sexual reproduction faithfully replicates organisms with the added benefit of allowing for variations on a theme. The exploratory evolutionary nature of this biological process is enhanced many times when it leaves the tightly regulated realm of nature where the basic elements of success revolve around food, sex, territory, and predation, and move to the relatively formless realm of ideas where most anything is possible. But not everything. Genes as units of biological information have very few successful radiations that improve on what is. Memes as units of cultural information have many more possibilities that might work but here too, not everything we wish to be true culturally, actually works to move a society effectively into the future. Broadly speaking, cultural strategies break into two camps: liberals who wish to challenge accepted constraints and conservatives who wish to preserve them. In the realm of sexuality, liberal forces explore new ways of mating which almost by definition cannot improve on nature’s tried and true method of mating males with females to produce offspring. However, the production of cultural offspring requires less genetic continuity and more memetic continuity, and so different strategies of cradle robbing ensue. Brood parasites like the common cuckoo move their eggs to an unsuspecting nest. They forage and fornicate freely while others invest in child rearing for them. In the realm of human society biology plays less of a role than cultural mimesis. Here, taking advantage of the long-term, painstaking investments made by biological parents and then converting those offspring to a different cultural project can be an extremely successful strategy. Cultural projection is gained without the high price and narrow margins of biological investments. Speech is the essential human realm where memes supplant genes in importance. I am much more defined by my beliefs and mores, my habits and values than by my genetic makeup. Therefore, as a parent, I project my children into the future provided they carrying my cherished beliefs, my language. This involves me in their education. Social media, public education, institutions of higher education and even Artificial Intelligence all compete with me to educate my children. ChatGPT communicates implicit suppositions and value judgements in ways that elude detection and complicate my ability to challenge them. The odds against my success in conveying my ideas of the world when they contravene the basic assumptions that pervade our thin cultural homogeneity are overwhelming. Such is my challenge with free speech today. Our supposedly open society is both more intrusive and monolithic. The barriers parents would erect against bad but attractive ideas are less successful. Moreso, short term results like popularity and sexual attention are more immediately available than the slow, long-term results gained from teaching my children competencies and the virtues which make for a happy adult family. We don’t gain from, nor can we effectively control the spread of bad ideas. Especially since my bad ideas may well be your good ideas. All we can do is allow this high stakes, and heavily fraught cultural experimentation to play out to what we hope is best results. It behooves wise parents to be on the right side of these experimentations so that successful children are projected into the future. Many institutions and associations which we once relied upon to help raise our children have adopted the most extreme forms of the liberal approach which has morphed into the call for autonomy at all costs. The responsibilities of child-rearing are jettisoned along with the virtues that being a parent requires. Here free speech is wrongly conceived as the ability to say whatever I feel without living with the consequences. The advantage of reaching these extremes is that the implausibility of their success is laid bare and their eventual failure ensured. The goal is to be far away when the house collapses or more optimistically to be ready to return when these institutions learn to right themselves. In the meantime, we build better alternatives, where truth telling, intelligent speech, trust, shared values, and time-tested ideas prove their worth by the healthy, productive, attractive, and capable adults that emerge from them. So long as people are free to parent as they see fit, then the adherents of true speech, virtuous speech and prudent speech will triumph over their impostors who will, along with their false and vicious institutions extinguish themselves without any help from me.

Trending Topics

Recently Active Rooms

Recently Active Thinkers