The Truth About 2025 MPSD School Board Candidates
user profile
MPSD2025
 March 27 2025
more_horiz

    In the upcoming Manitowoc School Board election, voters face a critical decision that will shape the future of our children's education. Among the candidates vying for positions on the board are Ann Holsen, David Bowman, and Mary Lofy Blahnik, three individuals who, despite their claims of nonpartisanship, have demonstrated a clear alignment with liberal ideologies that threaten to undermine the quality and integrity of our schools. As concerned citizens, it is our duty to examine the records, statements, and associations of these candidates to determine their fitness for the vital roles they seek. In this blog post, we will delve into the troubling evidence that exposes Holsen, Bowman, and Blahnik's liberal agendas, raising serious doubts about their ability to provide the impartial, student-focused leadership our school board so desperately needs. Join us as we shed light on the true colors of these candidates, exposing the risks they pose to our children's education and the future of our community.

    Mary Lofy Blahnik

     

    “In the fall of 2022, I left my Green Bay HR position briefly, as I was hired as the Director of HR for Manitowoc Public Schools. At that time, I was very concerned about the leadership of the central office and School Board, so after just two months, I returned to Green Bay, as I was not interested in being part of a leadership team that was making decisions that did not put student learning first.”

    Mary Lofy Blahnik's history of job-hopping between seven different school districts is a cause for concern. Blahnik spent a mere two months working in the very district she is now running to represent on the school board, only to leave because she disagreed with the direction the district was heading. This brief and unsatisfactory stint calls into question her ability to work collaboratively with other board members and administrators to enact positive change. This troubling pattern of behavior suggests that Blahnik may not be committed to the MPSD and could potentially abandon her post on the school board when faced with challenges or disagreements. The MPSD deserves someone who will move the district forward, not a quitter who will leave you, the voters.

    Mary Lofy Blahnik's attempt to leverage her volunteerism with a certified therapy dog as relevant experience for serving on the Manitowoc School Board is a prime example of her misplaced priorities and lack of understanding of the role of a school board member. Her work with therapy dogs is by no means a qualification for making critical decisions about our children's education, curriculum, and school policies. Blahnik's emphasis on her volunteer work with therapy dogs suggests a superficial approach to the complex issues facing our schools and a failure to grasp the gravity of the responsibilities she seeks to undertake.

    Mary Lofy Blahnik's self-proclaimed expertise in "equity and inclusion initiatives and practices" is a concerning indication of her commitment to pushing a liberal agenda within our schools. While the principles of equity and inclusion may sound appealing on the surface, they often serve as thinly veiled attempts to promote a particular ideological viewpoint at the expense of academic excellence and fairness.

    Ann Holsen

     

    While Ann Holsen frequently touts her experience in the nuclear sector as her primary qualification for the school board, she has yet to explain how this background is relevant to the challenges facing our schools today. The skills and knowledge required to succeed in the nuclear industry are vastly different from those needed to effectively manage educational institutions and shape policies that will benefit our students. Holsen's inability to connect her work experience to the realm of education raises serious doubts about her suitability for the school board.

    It is clear that Holsen's attempt to portray herself as a nonpartisan centrist is a facade. Her reluctance to address key issues directly, her use of Democratic buzzwords, and the color of her campaign signs being Kamala Harris blue, demonstrate that she is, in fact, a liberal candidate attempting to deceive voters. Our school board needs members who are transparent, knowledgeable, and genuinely committed to the best interests of our children, not those who hide behind empty rhetoric and vague statements.

    She refuses to directly answer questions about keeping pride materials and pornographic books in schools and if DEI should be implemented. Instead, she resorts to using buzzwords like "inclusive environments for all learners," a common tactic employed by Democratic candidates to mask their true intentions.

    When questioned about her stance on the Success for All curriculum change, Holsen admitted, "I am currently not a K-12 curriculum expert." This raises serious concerns about her ability to make informed decisions on crucial educational matters.

    David Bowman

     

    David Bowman retired from MPSD in 2024 and had a salary of $77,841, not including benefits. This salary was 15% higher than the average and 14% higher than the median salary in the MPSD and 18% higher than the state average.

    David Bowman's time as a choir teacher does not automatically qualify him for a position on the school board. Managing a classroom and conducting a choir are vastly different from the complex responsibilities and decision-making required of a school board member. Bowman's background does not demonstrate the necessary skills and expertise needed to navigate the multifaceted challenges of educational policy and administration. Our schools need leaders with a diverse set of experiences and a deep understanding of the issues at hand, not just those who can "conduct their way through a meeting."

    David Bowman's associations and views raise serious concerns about his ability to serve on the school board impartially. Bowman's Facebook friendships with special interest group ALLY (created by Dayna Goetz) leaders Bernie Starzewski, Jennifer Gleichner, and Lisa Johnston (current Vice Chair of the Manitowoc County Democratic Party), as well as school board members Keith Shaw and Kerry Trask (former chair of the Manitowoc County Democratic Party), suggest a strong alignment with liberal ideologies.

    When questioned about his stance on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), Bowman referred to an article promoting DEI, indicating his support for this controversial approach. Furthermore, he has expressed his approval of ALLY stickers and pride flags in schools, which many parents believe are inappropriate for educational settings.

    Bowman's opposition to school choice is another alarming aspect of his candidacy. By denying families the right to choose the best educational options for their children, Bowman reveals his preference for a one-size-fits-all approach that disregards the unique needs and values of individual students.

    To further emphasize David Bowman's alignment with liberal ideologies, it is worth noting that his yard signs bear the same design as those of known liberal school board member Keith Shaw. This striking similarity in campaign materials suggests a coordinated effort and shared agenda between the two, raising questions about Bowman's claim to be an independent voice for our children's education.

    In light of these facts, it is evident that David Bowman's candidacy is driven by a liberal agenda that prioritizes special interests over the well-being and education of our children. Our school board needs members who are objective, open-minded, and committed to providing a quality education for all students, not those who push a particular ideology at the expense of our children's futures.

    Bowman In His Own Words

     

    "To my fellow Christians who are cheering for Christian Nationalism... I wonder how many of our founding Fathers would be heretics in your eyes..." "Are you really in a position to question Harris's "record on crime" if you nominate a convicted felon?" "I have seen a video of him stumping another legislator using bible references to explain why she is wring in supporting Trumpsim and Christian Nationalism. It is powerful!" "One of the reasons I decided I SHOULD retire. There was no way I would have been able to keep my opinions to myself this coming election cycle." "Also... it will be able to fight more easily from outside than from the inside..." "I cannot support the current iteration of the GOP cozying up to dictators around the world at the expense of our relationships with democracy... You can listen to the leader of the GOP speak right now and hear him state what he believes. It is misogynistic, homo-phobic, racist, anti-worker..." He also made a comment criticizing the GOP for going after birth control. "Democrats support the majority of what I believe in."

    David Bowman's statements reveal a troubling lack of impartiality and a strong alignment with liberal ideologies. By openly criticizing Christian Nationalism, questioning the GOP's stance on crime, and expressing support for Democratic policies, Bowman demonstrates his inability to separate his personal political beliefs from that of the role of the school board. Bowman's declaration that he "cannot support the current iteration of the GOP" due to its alleged coziness with dictators and supposed misogyny, homophobia, racism, and anti-worker sentiments is a clear indication of his partisan bias. His comment criticizing the GOP for "going after birth control" and his admission that "Democrats support the majority of what I believe in" further underscore his liberal leanings. Moreover, Bowman's statement that he decided to retire because he "would not have been able to keep [his] opinions to [himself] this coming election cycle" raises concerns about his ability to serve on the school board with the required objectivity and professionalism.

    "It is not within the role of the schools (or the country) to pass judgment one way or another on how a student (or anyone) identifies. It is our role to ensure each student is able to achieve their full potential. From personal experience with transgender students, the discomfort they tend to show in their bodies seems quite debilitating. In Wisconsin, we have some guidelines from the WIAA. Students that are trans and let’s be honest the concern is about trans-females, must be on a year of medically documented testosterone blockers before they are allowed to participate in sports." - David Bowman

    David Bowman's response to the issue of Title IX and transgender students in sports reveals a concerning lack of understanding and a willingness to prioritize political correctness over fairness and safety. Bowman asserts that schools should not pass judgment on how a student identifies, but this stance fails to acknowledge the very real biological differences between males and females that can create an uneven playing field in sports. By disregarding these differences, Bowman's approach risks undermining the hard-fought gains of Title IX, which was designed to ensure equal opportunities for female athletes. Furthermore, Bowman's focus on the "discomfort" of transgender students ignores the potential discomfort and unfairness experienced by female athletes who may be forced to compete against biologically male opponents. While compassion for all students is important, it should not come at the expense of fairness and safety in sports. Bowman's reference to require trans-female, biological male, athletes to undergo a year of testosterone blockers before participating in sports, is an inadequate solution. This requirement does not fully address the physical advantages that biological males may have, even after a period of hormone therapy. In light of these concerns, it is clear that David Bowman's stance on Title IX and transgender athletes is misguided and potentially detrimental to the integrity of girls' sports in our schools. Our school board needs members who can balance compassion with fairness and prioritize the well-being of all students, not those who sacrifice fairness on the altar of political correctness.

    The Three

     

    Ann Holsen, David Bowman, and Mary Lofy Blahnik are listed as recommended candidates on the Manitowoc County Democratic Party's (which they spoke at a meeting of) and Wisconsin Education Association Council’s websites. These affiliations raise serious doubts about their ability to remain impartial and stand up to the teachers' union (Manitowoc Education Association) and special interest group ALLY (which the three were invited to a meet and greet at the creator's house and attended). Instead, it appears that these candidates would join forces with these groups, prioritizing their interests over those of our students and community.

    The current school board is run by the teacher’s union. We do not need more of the same. Electing candidates like Bowman and Mary Lofy Blahnik would only perpetuate this biased viewpoint and create a conflict of interest due to their previous district payroll’s.

    Bowman's and Blahnik’s attack on the Success for All (SFA) program, which has been the only program to demonstrate success in years, is troubling. Despite acknowledging that aspects of SFA have helped improve test scores, they support the board's decision to terminate the program without providing a clear, research-driven alternative. By dismissing the positive impact of SFA, they demonstrate a lack of commitment to evidence-based decision-making and a disregard for the needs of our students, along with a disregard of the non-sustainability among staff of changing programs after a short time.

    These three candidates have demonstrated a lack of commitment to the school board by failing to attend meetings before announcing their candidacy. This raises doubts about their willingness to dedicate the necessary time and effort to serve effectively.

    In light of this information, it is evident that Ann Holsen, David Bowman, and Mary Lofy Blahnik are not suited for a nonpartisan school board position. Our school board needs members who can put aside their personal political beliefs and prioritize the well-being and education of all students, not those who use their position to advance a particular ideological agenda of their liberal allies.

     

     Share on Facebook

     

    mpsd
    Filter By: