agenda, Single White Female
user profile
edX
 February 21 2023
more_horiz


    The anti-heterosexual, and therefore anti-marriage, anti-family agenda in western 'entertainment' is pretty obvious isn't it.


    In this story, this girl is with this guy, then finds out he had sex with another girl even while they were on the verge of planning their marriage.


    Surprise surprise. I'm often surprised when a heterosexual relationship appears to be working out in american 'entertainment', and then comes the predictable disappointment.


    Anyway, this girl has an upstairs friend who is renting an apartment there. And she goes to him to seek comfort. He's a nice guy. Very empathetic, very sympathetic, very supportive.....and he has a poster of some theater production on the wall that tells us that only 'gay' guys are cultured, sensitive, artistic, etc, etc.....as if all the great philosophers, writers, artists, musicians, dancers, humanitarians, in world history were all inclined to confuse their anus for a vagina.


    So my first thought as i watched this supportive scene was, 'definitely must be a homosexual', so as to continue the theme that heterosexual guys are largely unreliable, stupid, etc. I wonder why my mother didn't tell me when i was a kid that if i was a heterosexual, i must be stupid, a philanderer, uncultured, etc. If she did, i would have then taken on that role, or opted to aspire to have a man sodomise me in order to prove that i was a good guy.


    It is so predictable that one can immediately guess the 'sexual orientation' of a guy on the basis of how nice or cultured a guy is in much of western 'entertainment', and especially post-1980s. It carries on the theme that is oft-illustrated in scripts via the lament, 'oh why are all the good guys gay?'.



    NOW,


    whilst adult men may not be perturbed by the barrage of such scenes in such movies because they know that isn't true, and that many of their own generation, both men and women, know that to be untrue due to years of positive experiences of normal men-women relationships, they don't realise that those younger do not have such experiences, and that it the younger whom are most impressionable to such insidious 'entertainment' influences. That is how one generation after another are gradually turned against heterosexuality, marriage, and the family.


    Every generation that is given one progressive type of negative influence then passes on one less bit of morality to the next, and the next generation passes on even less as more media influences are piled on to what their parents failed to impress upon them.


    For example, one generation is taught that heterosexual promiscuity is alright. Then that generation fails to teach the next the virtue of keeping sex to the one you love. So the next generation is thus taught that being heterosexually promiscuous is alright by their parents not frowning upon it, and this makes it easier for their children to accept that bisexual promiscuity is alright when it is promoted by the media. And this goes on and on till there are no limits to 'the freedom to love'.


    If you study western entertainment from, say, the 1970s to the present, you can see this gradual and very orchestrated attack on heterosexuality, marriage, men, intelligence, religion, non-western cultures, etc, etc.



    IT'S


    very difficult to enjoy western entertainment, not only because of their overt propaganda, but also because one can finally see what it has led to in the present. And then one can't be blamed for looking at the vaunted 'white man' and wondering if it is true that their heads are so far up their rear orifices that they could french kiss their own tonsils.


    But the worse bit is that every successive generation of 'conservatives' in the west have themselves exacerbated this problem, and laid the foundation for it, by promoting what they thought was 'the right thing' and 'the real thing' onto the world, most of which were promoted to them by their media, etc, and which, unbeknownst to them, served as the foundation for the rise of much of the evil which they presently bemoan, and which infects the world through the children and youth of the world.


    Even Billy Graham in the 70s, for instance, although he was a Christian, promoted the sub-theme that the white man knew it all. And it was that which served to contribute to the foundation for the successive generations of people across the globe to just imbibe without question whatever the Corporation put on the western stage thereafter.


    Just keep in mind one thing. The western 'conservatives' of the present were the 'liberals' of the past, just as the 'liberals' in the west of the present will be the 'conservatives' of the west on the morrow. It is a cycle.


    Remember one of the golden rules, 'for things to get as shit as it is today, much of that in the past that was perceived to be good in the past was actually the foundation for it.'


    Evil cannot have its way without the unwitting collaboration of much of that which is perceive to be good.


    edX




    lgbt movies entertainment hollywood culture homosexuality heterosexuality
    Filter By: