Why Governments Censorship of 'Alternative' Information is Treason
user profile
edX
 May 18 2023
more_horiz



    It's very simple. 


    For any government to censor alternative information makes the government and their 'panel of experts' the sole source of information, truth, and therefore, the most potent source of deceit. When anything becomes the SOLE source of anything, that source becomes the most potent means of mass maim and murder. 


    [ On a side note, keep in mind that an 'expert' is one who has relatively extensive knowledge about a subject from one point of view, BUT not one who is the only 'expert' on the subject; not one who is not capable of using his 'expert' status to lie to the people; and not one who knows everything about the subject matter from one point of view; and not one who knows even anything about the subject matter from other points of view. Keep in mind that an 'expert' in driving is not incapable of running over people or falling asleep at the wheel. ]


    For government's to disregard that fact is itself proof that they aren't to be trusted, as any trustable source will never claim infallibility as they realise that they are only human, and therefore can make a mistake. 


    That is what makes the people themselves the sole experts in any matter by way of making final decisions, for to allow alleged 'experts' to do so is to possibly subject themselves to 'expert' liars and murderers. 


    Finally, alternative information is, in reality, another term for popular scrutiny of those placed by the people to look after their interests. To call THAT 'alternative' is an insult of the fact that the people are the supreme masters. A master is not an 'alternative' as they are the source of decisions, which makes the government the alternative to popular ascent. 


    That is why the allegation of 'misinformation' can never be levelled at the people because to do so is to,


    1. demonise the people as a source of information in the eyes of the people themselves and lead them to distrust themselves; and


    2. the cost of demonising popular information and skepticism comes at the price of delivering informational integrity to the government as the sole source of information and therefore potentially, lies.


    Any effort to demonise or marginalise this must be met with arrests by those contracted to serve and protect the public. Failing which, those tasked to do this are technically insurrectionists and terrorists as they become the protectors of the means through which all of the people can be harmed, and are no different from foreign invaders attempting to claim ownership over the lives of the people and determine anyone's right to exist. 


    Finally, the imposition of any medical measures is tantamount to a claim of ownership of the life of the individual. So long as any reason can be used to do this, whether true or not, and it can be used as a pretext for imposing or gradually training people to be amenable to mass slavery - which in turn leads to mass mutual alienation and a compromise of the people's self-defensive instinct - it cannot be countenanced by the people.


    Remember, Democracy is not mostly about the right to vote, but the right to DISTRUST those we put in positions of popular trust EFFECTIVELY. To remove the effectiveness of popular distrust via any measure is the most potent means of assault on democracy and the people. 



    edX

    treason democracy misinformation censorship
    212
    0
    212 views
    Filter By:

    Please confirm your account