Beyond Splitting LGB from TQI -- Are Trans Children The Enemy?
user profile
Predicting 2030
 March 02 2023
more_horiz

    ‘ . . . never allowing ourselves to be deterred from the path of international revolution.’

    ‘ . . . trans people are perhaps a useful source of recruits . . . ’

    Transgender Marxism, Gleeson, 2021

     

    Our basic position is unchanged:


    the devolutionary left seeks to ‘deconstruct’ the male-female distinction (‘sexual dichotomy’), the biological family, and all nation-states.

     


    However, we have enough new information to make some distinctions. Readers, we’re just going to step away from LGB, and focus on better understanding TQI.

     

    Are trans children the enemy? No. They are victims – but they are victims who are cooperating!

     

    Are ordinary left-wingers the enemy? They are like drug mules – guilty, but at a lower level. (Except that drug mules can’t enact laws!) It is arguably the case that members of entities like Australia’s Labor Party, and the U.S. Democrats, are grossly ignorant of the complexities of this issue, but are rather puddling along with the kiddies-trapped-in-the-wrong-bodies narrative.

     

    What is becoming increasing clear – Brubaker, Rothblatt, Lewis, Gleeson – is a (rough) division between ‘trans of between’ and ‘trans of beyond.’ That is, between a ‘controlled’ politics of trans, and an ‘uncontrolled’ politics of trans.


    Fantastically, the ‘trans of between’ is already mundane: a man becomes a woman, or vice versa. But the ‘trans of beyond’ quite specifically knows no bounds. 


    Brubaker says this – but not explicitly. Rothblatt say this – but not explicitly. Lewis’s explicitly Communist text says it explicitly, but focuses on the deconstruction of the family. But Gleeson’s text, Transgender Marxism, rushes past any ‘controlled’ non-revolutionary trans-of-between to a nihilistic trans-of-beyond.*

     

    Fifty years ago, Marxists were ‘just’ adherent to an anti-essentialism of ‘men and women’s brains are the same.’ But they have theorized a new Marxism in which sexual dichotomy – science – has been recast as a capitalist myth.

     

    Transgender Marxism is the top-level enemy at this point.

     

    And corporations profiting from genital-rearrangement surgeries? They deserve a special note!

    The ‘seeping’ of ideology into ‘hard sciences’ should be an issue of our age. Somehow, we have anti-science postmodernists and theoretically-hard-science corporations in alliance. Of course, it is the wily corporations who are the realists -- $$$$$ -- but it’s purty inneresting that there’s no discussion about this.

     

    *And the South American travesti movement? The one text we have is rabidly trans-of-beyond. There’s another new text: The trans degenerates end the family, 2022. No English translation yet.

    political theory political history trans gender postmodernism
    122
    0
    122 views
    Filter By:

    Please confirm your account