recent image
Pracheta: The Forethinker
Sadhika Pant
 July 18 2024 at 10:35 am
more_horiz
Significance of the Name "Pracheta" The name "Pracheta" is derived from two Sanskrit words: "pra" meaning "before" and "chetas" meaning "mind" or "consciousness." Thus, Pracheta can be translated as "forethinker" or "one who has foresight." This name signifies a person who possesses a forward-thinking mind, someone who anticipates and plans for the future. In the context of Hindu mythology and philosophy, such a trait is highly valued as it implies wisdom, prudence, and a deep understanding of the consequences of one's actions. Role in Hindu Religion Pracheta, the father of Valmiki, holds a significant yet subtle role in Hindu religion. Valmiki, often referred to as the Adi Kavi (the first poet), is the revered author of the epic Ramayana. Although Pracheta himself is not a central figure in Hindu mythology, his role as the progenitor of Valmiki ties him to the vast narrative of Hindu religious and philosophical thought. The foresight implied by his name suggests that he may have possessed qualities that he passed down to his son, Valmiki, who later became an enlightened sage and a master storyteller. Pracheta’s foresight can be symbolically linked to the prophetic nature of Valmiki’s poetry, which foresees the moral and ethical dilemmas of humanity and offers profound lessons through the story of Lord Rama. According to legend, Valmiki was a notorious highwayman before his transformation into a sage. His encounter with the divine sage Narada marked a turning point in his life. Narada's teachings and the mantra "Mara" (meaning "kill" in Sanskrit) led Valmiki into deep meditation. As he repeated "Mara," it gradually transformed into "Rama" (the name of the divine prince in the Ramayana). This shift in his consciousness symbolised the metamorphosis from a life of sin to one of spiritual awakening. This narrative underscores the power of transformation and the eternal resonance of divine names, illustrating how even the most sinful can attain enlightenment and contribute to the spiritual heritage of humanity. Parallels with Prometheus Prometheus, a figure from Greek mythology, shares a strikingly similar epithet to Pracheta. Prometheus's name is derived from the Greek "promētheus," meaning "forethought." Like Pracheta, Prometheus is celebrated for his forward-thinking and his contributions to humanity. In Hindu philosophy, the concept of foresight is intertwined with dharma (righteousness) and karma (action and its consequences). Pracheta, as the forethinker, represents the ideal of living a life guided by wisdom and prudence, ensuring that one's actions align with the greater cosmic order. Similarly, in Greek philosophy, Prometheus is best known for his defiance of Zeus by stealing fire from the gods and giving it to mankind, an act that symbolises the transmission of knowledge and the overcoming of ignorance to progress toward a more enlightened state of being. Interestingly, the son of Pracheta was given the name Agni at birth, meaning fire, and only later became known as Valmiki. It is worth noting that both Prometheus and Pracheta are associated with the gift of fire to humanity. The discovery of fire was a pivotal moment in human evolution, profoundly impacting brain development and cognitive abilities. Cooking food made it easier to digest and increased its nutritional value, allowing for more efficient energy use. This dietary shift contributed to a smaller gut, freeing up metabolic energy that supported larger brain growth. The enhanced brain size and function facilitated advanced cognitive abilities, social behaviours, and tool-making skills, setting the stage for the complex societies we have today. Fire not only provided warmth and protection but also fuelled the evolutionary leap that shaped human intelligence and societal progress.
recent image
Ravana: Intellect Gone Wrong
Sadhika Pant
 July 05 2024 at 10:05 am
more_horiz
post image
Ravana, a central figure in Hindu mythology, is often depicted as a complex character whose intellect and ambition shape his role as both a villain and a tragic figure in the epic, Ramayana. Similar to Milton's Satan in "Paradise Lost," Ravana's character reflects the archetype of the intellectual rebel against divine order. Ravana's Intellect and Villainy Ravana, the king of Lanka, is renowned for his intelligence, mastery of the Vedas, and proficiency in warfare and governance. His unparalleled intellect often leads him to challenge divine beings and assert his dominance over gods and mortals alike. This ambition and pride drive many of his actions, including the abduction of Sita, the wife of Lord Rama, which becomes the central conflict in the epic Ramayana. Ravana's intellect turns him into a villain primarily because it fuels his sense of entitlement and superiority. Despite his knowledge, he falls prey to his desires and ego, ultimately leading to his downfall. Parallels with Milton's Satan and Goethe’s Faust Ravana’s intellect and wisdom make him a respected figure among the rakshasa (demon) race and a formidable adversary to the gods themselves. John Milton's portrayal of Satan in "Paradise Lost" shares similarities with Ravana. Like Ravana, Satan is depicted as a figure of immense intellect and pride, once a favoured angel who rebels against God's authority. Both characters embody the archetype of the fallen intellectual who challenges established orders and faces the consequences of their defiance. Both Ravana and Satan are tragic figures whose intellect and ambition lead them to rebel against higher powers, setting themselves in opposition to divine or cosmic harmony. Their stories serve as cautionary tales about the dangers of unchecked ambition and the consequences of using intellect for selfish or destructive purposes. Similarly, Faust, the protagonist of Goethe’s “Faust,” is depicted as a scholar dissatisfied with the limits of human knowledge and experience. His relentless pursuit of ultimate understanding and transcendental knowledge drives him to make a pact with Mephistopheles, trading his soul for unlimited knowledge and worldly pleasures. Faust’s quest is representative of the human condition’s existential struggle, reflecting the perpetual desire to transcend human limitations and achieve a higher state of being. Like Ravana, Faust’s ambition is both his greatest strength and his fatal flaw, propelling him into a journey that tests the boundaries of morality and ethics. Symbolism of Ravana's 10 Heads Ravana's ten heads symbolise his multifaceted intellect and knowledge. According to mythological interpretations, each head represents a specific facet of his personality or prowess. However, these heads also signify his arrogance and inflated ego, as he believes himself invincible due to his intellectual superiority. Moreover, the ten heads are often interpreted as symbolising the ten vices or "dushtagunas" that Ravana embodies: lust, anger, greed, attachment, pride, jealousy, selfishness, injustice, cruelty, and ego. These vices which have minds of their own (quite literally), when combined with his intellect, amplify his capacity for villainy and ultimately contribute to his downfall. The Nuanced Nature of Evil It's fascinating to observe how Hinduism, which venerates the pursuit of knowledge, dedicates an entire epic to illustrating that intellect can lead not only to our salvation but also to our downfall, particularly when separated from the divine. In essence, Ravana, a Brahmin—an esteemed priestly caste entrusted with the study of Vedas and worship—ultimately meets his own undoing through his intellectual prowess. In Hindu philosophy, true spiritual growth is achieved through a balance of knowledge (gyan), devotion (bhakti), and righteous action (karma). Ravana embodies the archetype of evil in Hindu mythology, yet his character is not one-dimensional. A key aspect that sets Ravana apart from Milton’s Satan is that he is not exactly in rebellion with God; rather, his actions challenge the laws of dharma by presenting a figure who, although highly learned and capable, chooses a path of moral decay. The central conflict of the Ramayana is deeply human in essence. It is not a battle between divine and demonic forces but a clash of moral ideals between two mortals, with an ultimate triumph of dharma over adharma. Ravana embodies many qualities that are traditionally considered virtuous, such as bravery, devotion, and intelligence. He shows devotion to Lord Shiva, and complex relationships with his family members add layers to his portrayal. This duality within Ravana highlights the nuanced nature of evil, suggesting that it often arises not from a lack of virtue, but from the corruption and misuse of one's abilities and attributes. Philosophical interpretations often explore the nature of evil and its manifestations, reflecting on how intellect and spiritual devotion can coexist with moral transgressions.
recent image
Monotheism and Polytheism
Sadhika Pant
 July 25 2024 at 09:42 am
more_horiz
Monotheistic Faith Systems: Unity and the Problem of Exclusion Monotheistic faith systems, which centre around the worship of a single deity, offer the benefit of a uniting principle placed at the apex of a hierarchical structure. This unifying element can foster a sense of cohesion and shared purpose among adherents. The singular focus on one deity can create a clear, consistent moral framework and a strong collective identity. For example, in Christianity, the belief in one God provides a foundation for universal moral guidelines, promoting a sense of brotherhood and shared values among believers. However, the rigidity of monotheism can also lead to significant dangers. The exclusivity inherent in monotheistic systems can lead to an "us versus them" mentality, where those outside the faith are viewed with suspicion or hostility. This can lead to social fragmentation, intolerance, and even conflict. The emphasis on a single truth can stifle diversity of thought and practice, potentially leading to authoritarianism where dissenting voices are suppressed. Polytheistic Faith Systems: Diversity and the Problem of Integration Polytheistic faith systems, like Hinduism, worship multiple deities, each representing different aspects of life and the universe. This multiplicity allows for a rich diversity of beliefs, practices, and rituals. The pluralism inherent in polytheism can encourage tolerance and acceptance of different perspectives, fostering a more inclusive and harmonious society. However, the diversity within polytheism can also lead to potential dangers. Without a single unifying principle, there is a risk of fragmentation and lack of cohesion among followers. The various deities and their respective mythologies can sometimes lead to conflicting beliefs and practices, creating divisions within the community. Additionally, the absence of a centralised authority can make it challenging to maintain a consistent moral framework, potentially leading to ethical ambiguity. How do the polytheistic Hindus achieve unity? At the heart of Hindu philosophy lies the concept of Brahman, the ultimate reality or universal spirit. Brahman is the singular, all-encompassing divine presence that transcends individual deities and is the source of all existence. This principle is encapsulated in the ancient Vedic saying, "Ekam Sat, Vipra Bahudha Vadanti," which means, "Truth is one, the wise call it by many names." This idea suggests that while the divine can be experienced and expressed in countless forms, all these forms are manifestations of the same underlying reality. Thus, whether one worships Vishnu, Shiva, Lakshmi, or any other deity, they are ultimately connecting with Brahman. This philosophical cornerstone fosters a sense of unity among believers, despite the surface-level diversity of their worship practices. In Hinduism, deities represent various aspects of life and cosmic principles. For example, Saraswati embodies knowledge and wisdom, while Lakshmi signifies wealth and prosperity. This multiplicity allows individuals to relate to the divine in a way that is personally meaningful to them. Yet, these deities are not seen as isolated or competing entities but rather as different expressions of the same ultimate reality. How did the polytheistic Ancient Greeks achieve unity? Ancient Greek religion, characterised by a pantheon of gods and goddesses, found unity through philosophical integration. Heraclitus introduced the idea of logos, a rational principle that governed the cosmos, bringing order and harmony to the ever-changing world. Heraclitus is often credited with introducing the concept of logos as a fundamental principle of change and stability in the universe. For Heraclitus, logos represented the rational structure that underlies all reality. He famously stated, "You cannot step into the same river twice," emphasising that while everything is in a state of flux, there is a consistent order or pattern to these changes, governed by logos. Plato saw logos as the principle of rationality that connects the world of Forms (the true reality) with the material world. In his dialogues, Plato often uses logos to refer to reasoned discourse and the process of logical thinking. By viewing each deity as an aspect or expression of logos, the Greeks could maintain a coherent religious framework that embraced a variety of divine forms while recognizing an underlying unity. For instance, Apollo, associated with prophecy, music, and healing, could be seen as an embodiment of the rational and harmonious aspects of logos. Athena, the goddess of wisdom and warfare strategy, represented the intellectual and strategic dimensions of logos. This understanding allowed for a cohesive theological system where the gods were not isolated entities but interconnected parts of a larger rational order. How do the monotheistic Christians achieve diversity? Christianity, while rooted in the monotheistic belief in one God, achieves a diversity through the philosophical integration of unity and fringe elements. A proper unity must leave room for the fringe because the limits of the unity are defined by the fringe. Without the fringe, unity risks becoming tyrannical, stifling creativity, and excluding those who do not conform. Conversely, without a central unity, the fringe can become dominant, leading to chaos and the collapse of clear definitions. The fringe, often seen as the stranger or the marginal, plays a critical role in enriching and challenging the core, preventing stagnation. The cherubs placed at the edge of Eden with a flaming sword represent the boundaries and the mysterious, powerful fringe of God's creation. These figures symbolise the limits of human experience and understanding, reminding believers that there is a divine mystery and power at the fringes of their existence. These boundaries define and protect the sacred space, just as the fringe defines and strengthens unity. Gargoyles, often grotesque and unusual, serve not only as architectural features but also as symbolic protectors of the sacred spaces they adorn. They represent the fringe, the strange and the monstrous, guarding the purity of the central unity. Their presence on sacred buildings suggests that what is marginal or grotesque is integral to the protection and definition of what is sacred. Strangers, or those outside the immediate community, play significant and often important roles in the Biblical narrative. These figures often serve as catalysts for change, sources of wisdom, and symbols of God's inclusive love and justice. Jethro is a prime example of how a stranger can significantly influence the trajectory of God's people. As Moses' father-in-law and a priest of Midian, Jethro was an outsider to the Israelite community. However, his counsel and wisdom were crucial in shaping Moses' leadership and the governance of Israel. This principle of unity and fringe extends beyond religious contexts into political and social realms. A society that embraces its marginal elements—the stranger, the artist, the outcast, the unconventional thinker—becomes more vibrant and resilient. Marginal elements challenge the status quo, inspire innovation, and prevent the tyranny of uniformity. It is this balance—where unity acknowledges the role of the fringe and diversity is anchored by a unifying thread—that fosters a truly enriched and harmonious existence.
recent image
God-Given Peace: John 14:15-31
Cam
 July 24 2024 at 11:04 am
more_horiz
Often when reading a passage from a different translation, I catch new words or ideas that I have never seen before. Perhaps this is the translation’s or translator’s fault, or maybe, the original language used a word that conveyed something more that this translation wants to draw out. Whatever the reason, this passage includes a word and an idea that I have not ever noticed before. In verse 27, we read Jesus’ promise, and see this “new” word/idea: “I’m leaving you peace. I’m giving you my peace. I don’t give you the kind of peace that the world gives. So don’t be troubled or cowardly.” (John 14:27 GW) Jesus tells us not to be cowardly? What does that have to do with the peace He promises? Some might believe that God gives us peace in situations where we have no power to change the circumstances. This is often the case. But where people go too far in their thinking is that God’s peace excuses them from being engaged. Receiving God’s peace is not a sign that we can now retreat. That would be “cowardly”. The peace God has promised comes on a deeper level. His peace fills your heart. His peace assures us that we are loved, forgiven, saved, and now empowered to act. His peace says that He will be with us as we face whatever the future holds. Peace that the world gives is different. This peace is bartered and temporary. It could be the lull in a storm of circumstances. The world’s peace is nice, but it cannot fill our lives like God’s peace. God’s peace is present when things get out of control. God’s peace remains when the world’s peace has expired and left. God’s peace is peace that I want. When life throws us doubts and uncertainties, with Jesus’ peace, we can be empowered and freed to move forward – and moving forward with God is not cowardly! This post first appeared on ReflectiveBibleStudy.com What do you think? Do you agree/disagree? Leave your thoughts below.
recent image
SPECIAL WEEKEND THOUGHT: 👉 God Is Greater 📖 ...
Cam
 June 29 2024 at 11:02 am
more_horiz
“Do not be anxious about anything, but in every situation, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 4:6-7 NIV) “Do not let your heart envy sinners, but always be zealous for the fear of the Lord. There is surely a future hope for you, and your hope will not be cut off.” (Proverbs 23:17-18 NIV) “Many are the plans in a person’s heart, but it is the Lord’s purpose that prevails.” (Proverbs 19:21 NIV) This past week, many people faced disappointment as something that they expected to happen didn't. This thing could be something in their personal lives, or something happening in the broader world. Since the political state of the world is at or near the top of many minds, this weekend is a great time to share a simple reminder: God > politics. We could just as easily write: • God > politicians • God > democrats • God > republicans • God > liars • God > cheaters • God > evil • God > sinners (i.e. every human living today) In Romans 3:23, Paul reminds those in the early church that all have sinned and have fallen short of God’s glory (i.e. God’s standard). Every person living today, you and I included, has missed reaching the standard God set for us. We all have failed. Equally challenging is assuming that we know exactly what God’s preferred outcome is in a situation we don’t understand. Some people might feel that if they had done more to push for a different outcome in a situation they faced, then God’s will would have been brought about, rather than what happened. However, it is dangerous for us to assume we know the outcome God wants in any situation. Take Jesus’ crucifixion weekend. The religious leaders planned to skip arresting Jesus that weekend (Matthew 26:5, Mark 14:2). However, God’s plan was for that weekend to be remembered for eternity. Also, on the night of Jesus’ arrest, Peter insisted he would never deny Jesus (Matthew 26:31-35). Instead, just like Jesus predicted, Peter denied Him all three times. Even the Old Testament prophet Jonah, when he ran away from God’s mission for him, had his experience with the enormous fish transformed into a foreshadowing of Jesus on crucifixion weekend (Matthew 12:40). Each of these situations happened differently than what sinners planned — but each of these situations landed firmly within God’s plan. When things appear to not follow our preferred plan, remember that God is greater, His plan is greater, and He knows more than we do about how to set the stage for Jesus’ return and the end of sin. Even while the events of this past week might not have conformed to what you would have liked to have happened, it would be a mistake to assume that God was not involved. Just like God was involved in redirecting the plans of sinners back onto His plan during crucifixion weekend, it is much safer to believe that He was behind what has been happening recently — and that He has a bigger purpose in mind for it. Together, let’s take the disappointment and reframe it into one more reason we can trust God — because God is greater! 🙏 📖 ✝️ 👍
recent image
SPECIAL WEEKEND THOUGHT: 👉 Working With Our...
Cam
 July 20 2024 at 11:02 am
more_horiz
“May the favor of the Lord our God rest on us; establish the work of our hands for us— yes, establish the work of our hands.” (Psalm 90:17 NIV) “Praise the Lord, all you servants of the Lord who minister by night in the house of the Lord. Lift up your hands in the sanctuary and praise the Lord.” (Psalm 134:1‑2 NIV) “Can a mother forget the baby at her breast and have no compassion on the child she has borne? Though she may forget, I will not forget you! See, I have engraved you on the palms of my hands; your walls are ever before me.” (Isaiah 49:15‑16 NIV) When my kids were younger, for a Christmas gift, they received kid’s tool boxes. However, far from being “play” tools, the tools in these kits were real hammers, screwdrivers, pliers and more. These tools were just a little smaller, making them kid friendly even though I will admit that I've used them occasionally when my tools were not as close. Several months later, my wife asked me if I could find some scrap wood for them to play with, so they can hammer nails and screw screws in to make things. While I don’t have much scrap wood lying around at home, I found some scrap wood destined for a dumpster at the place I work. However, this scrap had a slight problem: Each piece also came with a half dozen long staples sticking out one end — which is less ideal for kids aged 5 & 7. But this problem also came with an opportunity: this could be the first project for this pile of wood. Yesterday, for about two hours, the three of us worked together to pull the staples out of the pieces of wood using hammers, pliers, and screwdrivers. As we worked on this project, making a little assembly line for progress, I could not help but think of the skills being taught as we worked with our hands. We learned some problem solving, how to pick the right tool for each task, and even teamwork, as some of us were better than others at various tasks. And all of this happened without the aid of anything electronic. This even also reminded me of three other things. First, for many years, perhaps even over two decades of His developing life, Jesus likely worked with His hands helping Joseph with carpentry. Second, this event reminded me of how we can use our hands to praise God, as the psalmist wrote at the beginning of Psalm 134. Third, this event reminded me of God’s message through Isaiah that we are engraved on the palms of God’s hands. Being engraved on God’s hands is very relevant! This statement foreshadowed the nail scars Jesus would gain from facing the cross. These scars would come because Jesus was paying the debt of sin that He did not owe. Also, being engraved on God’s hands challenges us to do God’s will and to show God’s character in the world around us. If we need an example to follow, model Jesus, who modeled God the best! As we look forward to Jesus returning, let’s use our hands to show His love to those He brings our way! 🙏 📖 ✝️ 👍
recent image
When He Left: John 16:16-33
Cam
 July 02 2024 at 11:12 am
more_horiz
While Jesus wanted to be clear with His followers, sometimes we as His followers can get things twisted in our minds when reading some of the things that He has said. As an example, a simple reading of a statement Jesus shares with His disciples prior to being arrested and crucified may cause us to be confused over what He actually meant. During this final conversation with the disciples before His arrest, Jesus tells them, “I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.” (John 16:24 NIV) The next big thing to happen was Jesus’ death, and if we look for evidence that says Jesus went to the Father at death, we may find some verses that could help support that theory. However, just three days later, Jesus clearly stated that He had not yet returned to the Father. Jesus tells Mary, “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’” (John 20:17 NIV) According to what Jesus told Mary, it was following the resurrection that Jesus ascended to heaven. Did He do this before meeting them in the upper room and while fishing on the lake, or was this a statement that foreshadowed the official ascension forty days later? I don’t know the answer to this, but the clear truth John shares in His gospel is that Jesus did not leave to go to the Father at His death. Instead, Jesus’ death and resurrection marked the completion of His earthly ministry, and signaled the start of His heavenly ministry on our behalf. This means that Jesus is in heaven right now looking at our life’s record. Jesus isn’t doing this to find reasons to keep us out of heaven. There are too many reasons to keep us out of heaven than even He could count. Instead, Jesus is looking for reasons that give us entrance into heaven – and the only reason we have that works is having accepted the free gift God has offered to us through Jesus’ death on the cross. We accept His gift by placing our faith, hope, trust, and belief in Jesus, and when God finds this declaration in our life’s record, we are able to be saved for eternity. This post first appeared on ReflectiveBibleStudy.com What do you think? Do you agree/disagree? Leave your thoughts below.
recent image
Not Recognizing Jesus: John 21:1-14
Cam
 July 09 2024 at 11:01 am
more_horiz
When we look at the fishing trip the disciples took after Jesus’ resurrection, we can see an amazing picture of how God moves, and how He may choose to work in our lives. When everything has been finished, there is no question left in our minds whether it was God working or not – we just know it. After this miracle, John tells us that Jesus invites them for breakfast. John also adds that, “None of the disciples dared ask him, ‘Who are you?’ They knew it was the Lord.” (John 21:12b NIV) With the massive catch of fish after a night filled with disappointment, every disciple who was present at that breakfast meal had no doubt that the person sitting with them was Jesus. They may not have recognized Jesus as clearly in His resurrected body, but there was no doubt in their minds that it was Him. This detail John includes in this event is important for us to remember. With this detail, we can learn that just because we don’t recognize Jesus moving in an event, this does not mean that He is absent. Just because an event does not line up with our picture of God, we should not discount the possibility that God has a purpose in mind through what happened. This even is the case in horrible events as well. Note that God does not cause bad events to happen, but in every bad event that He allows to happen, I believe that He has a way of bringing good from it. What happened may not have been our first choice, and it definitely was not His first choice, but if He allowed it, He can use it for His glory. In this miracle, none of the disciples truly recognized Jesus like they knew Him before. Following the catch of fish, an unnamed disciple (assumed to be John), identified that the man on the shore must have been Jesus. Prior to that, none of the disciples recognized Him. Even sitting on the shore next to Jesus, it seems as though the disciples didn’t recognize Him clearly. It seems as though John tells us that each disciple had the question in their minds to ask Jesus who He is, but none of them were brave enough to actually ask – and also because they all believed the man to be Jesus. This brings us back to this big idea: Just because we don’t recognize Jesus moving in an event does not mean that He is absent. Just because an event does not line up with our picture of God, we should not discount the possibility that God has a purpose in mind through what happened. This post first appeared on ReflectiveBibleStudy.com What do you think? Do you agree/disagree? Leave your thoughts below.
recent image
God Waits For Us: Luke 22:14-20
Cam
 July 10 2024 at 11:00 am
more_horiz
Often in my life, I find myself praying, and then waiting for God to answer. Perhaps you can relate with this experience. Sometimes these prayers receive a clear response, while other times, I am left waiting for a really long time, and even today, I have some prayers that I’m still waiting to receive or observe an answer for. However, while we often wait on God, have you ever thought of the idea of God waiting for us? While I’m sure for many, He is waiting for them to repent and return to Him, but I’m actually talking about a different sort of waiting. In our passage for this entry, have you ever noticed one of Jesus’ most amazing promises: “For I tell you, I will never eat it until it is given its full meaning in the Kingdom of God. . . I tell you that from now on I will not drink this wine until the Kingdom of God comes.” (Luke 22:16, 18 GNT) Jesus promised His disciples that He will wait for them before doing the two most symbolic parts of the last supper ever. Jesus is waiting for His second coming before taking part in communion with us – though when He returns, and we have the big communion feast, there will be an exponentially larger crowd present than the original disciples. This means that Jesus is waiting for you and I as His followers as well. So what does this mean for us today? God has a different frame of time than we do. Jesus has been “waiting” for close to 2,000 years and this is because He wants as many people as possible to experience His second “communion-feast”. While we often wait on God, He is also waiting for you and me. When we arrive in Heaven, there will be a feast prepared, and chances are, it will begin with communion – Jesus’ adaptation of the Passover supper. What are you doing to get ready for that special day? This post first appeared on ReflectiveBibleStudy.com What do you think? Do you agree/disagree? Leave your thoughts below.
recent image
A Greater Testimony: John 5:16-47
Cam
 July 23 2024 at 11:03 am
more_horiz
During a response Jesus gave to a group of Jewish leaders, He shares a statement and concept that is incredibly profound when we stop to think about it – and in this statement is something that we can all apply in our lives 2,000 years later. While giving His response, Jesus told the Jewish leaders, “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. There is another who testifies in my favor, and I know that his testimony about me is true.” (John 5:31-32 NIV) Perhaps you have known someone who seems to speak highly of themselves and their accomplishments. Individuals like this will brag about things they have done, who they know, what they own, or any number of other things that help them look good in whatever conversation they are having. However, the principle Jesus shares is that testimony about oneself should always make us cautious about believing it because it is rarely ever true. When someone else says something positive about the individual, it is more believable. Jesus says that His testimony about Himself, if it were by itself, would not be valid, but there is another who testifies about Him, making Jesus’ claims valid. While we might be quick to point out John the Baptist, who was Jesus’ cousin and forerunner in ministry, Jesus immediately acknowledges but discounts John by saying, “You have sent to John and he has testified to the truth. Not that I accept human testimony; but I mention it that you may be saved. John was a lamp that burned and gave light, and you chose for a time to enjoy his light.” (John 5:33-35 NIV) Jesus mentions John the Baptist as a secondary witness that would be someone everyone would know of – including the non-believing Jewish leaders. However, Jesus Himself does not need to rest on John’s testimony. Jesus continues His response by saying, “I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the works that the Father has given me to finish—the very works that I am doing—testify that the Father has sent me. And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form, nor does his word dwell in you, for you do not believe the one he sent.” (John 5:36-38 NIV) God the Father is Jesus’ second witness, and God the Father validated Jesus’ ministry by giving Him the power to do the tasks that He had send Him to do. God the Father even spoke from heaven on a number of occasions, but those present who didn’t believe did not understand what was being proclaimed. The key in Jesus’ words to learning the truth about Him and the key to being able to hear the Father is simply by believing in the One He sent and by paying attention to the truth He has already shared in the past. These Jewish leaders did not believe in Jesus, and because of this, they missed out on seeing, hearing, and experiencing what He was doing during their lifetimes – and their unbelief led them to crucify their own Messiah. For us, we should focus on the testimony we have been given regarding Jesus and on the truth God has revealed through the Bible, and when we have these two things in place, we can move forward through life with Him by our side directing our steps. This post first appeared on ReflectiveBibleStudy.com What do you think? Do you agree/disagree? Leave your thoughts below.

Trending Topics

Recently Active Rooms

Recently Active Thinkers